Political economy editor offers new take on inequality

Political economy editor offers new take on inequality

Turning conventional market wisdom on its head, John Tamny gave a thought-provoking presentation to students and faculty members to show why he thinks what is commonly believed about free markets is untrue.

On March 23, Tamny, political economy editor at Forbes, gave a presentation on The Wonders of Inequality, sponsored by the BB&T Center for the Study of Capitalism.

“As individuals, if you couldn’t pursue inequality, your life would be miserable,” Tamny said. “We all as individuals are in the pursuit of inequality and that’s what makes life good.”

Tamny localized his argument, asking attendees of the event if they felt at all disenfranchised due to the fact that Wake Forest has educated some exceptional, unequal alumni such as Arnold Palmer and Chris Paul. 

Story continues below advertisement

“Was anyone at Wake Forest weakened because Arnold Palmer became the worldwide face of golf?” Tamny asked. “No; Wake Forest is improved by the highly unequal people that attended here.”

Tamny explained that while inequality is under attack by politicians and government, they could not be more wrong.

“If you want to spread the wealth of the rich around, the best way to do that is to let them hold onto it,” Tamny said. “Unless (the rich) are literally stuffing it under their mattress, others have much more access to it through the marketplace.”

Tamny discussed his view that because the rich have money to lose, they are more likely to invest capital in entrepreneurial ideas. Tamny noted that businesses like Amazon, Coca-Cola and numerous Silicon Valley companies would have failed without the money of exceptionally wealthy people that could take risks on exciting new ideas that could have easily failed.

Students asked questions and also offered criticism to Tamny, which he readily accepted and responded to. 

“I thought his points were very intriguing,” said sophomore Libby Davis. “It was also fun to hear students ask him insights on his ideology and even more interesting to hear a student’s attempt to criticize his argument.”

While at Wake Forest, Tamny also visited journalism students to talk about building a career in journalism.

“He told us how the print industry is in decline, but that we still have opportunities to be journalists because of online media, digital reporting and other ways that are available of us to enter into the media field,” said junior journalism student Madison Yauger.

Besides being an editor at Forbes, Tamny is also the editor of RealClearMarkets.com, a senior fellow at the Reason Foundation, and a senior economic advisor to Toreador Research and Trading. Tamny is author of two books, his most recent being, Who Needs the Fed?: What Taylor Swift, Uber and Robots Tell us About Money, Credit and Why We Should Abolish America’s Central Bank.

View Comments (1)
More to Discover

Comments (1)

All Old Gold & Black Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • T

    tdaly29Apr 1, 2017 at 2:27 pm

    So now the Executive Director James Otteson of the Koch sponsored BB&T Center for the Study of Capitalism , has invited John Tamny a senior fellow at the Koch sponsored Reason Foundation to give a presentation. As usual for these Koch sponsored presentations a simplistic straw dog is presented and destroyed. The Koch’s ideology, which thinks taxes on the rich are a socialist plot, is far to the right of Hayek and Friedman.
    How many more Koch sponsored speakers are is the BB&T Center for the
    Study of Capitalism going to invite???

    Just to set the record straight, Hayek in The Road to Serfdom, allows for a minimum income level for people and medical care provided through the government and paid for by taxes. This seems ti be is contrary to Otteson’s The End of Socialism. And as John Tammy’s Who Needs the Fed? is the
    opposite of Friedman’s A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960 in
    which he states that the Fed could have alleviated, if not ended, the great
    depression if it provided liquidity to the banks. Friedman was proven correct
    during the Bush/Cheney “Great Recession”

    Reply