Criticism of Wake Forest medical student is excessive
Kychelle Del Rosario has faced undue criticism, while the bigotry of her patient has been largely ignored
April 7, 2022
Wake Forest medical student Kychelle Del Rosario is coming under fire — particularly from right-wing news outlets — over a now-deleted tweet.
“I had a patient I was doing a blood draw on see my pronoun pin and loudly laugh to the staff, ‘She/Her? Well, of course it is. What other pronouns even are there? It?’ I missed his vein so he had to get stuck twice,” Del Rosario tweeted on Tuesday, March 29.
Twitter users were quick to condemn Rosario for purportedly violating the Hippocratic Oath to do no harm and “assaulting” a patient over “[differences] in political beliefs”, while failing to offer any substantive or nuanced criticism of the bigotry expressed by her patient.
The crux of the issue at hand is not the conduct of Del Rosario, but the bigotry expressed by her patient. In response to this backlash, Ewen Liu — also a Wake Med student — came to Del Rosario’s defense.
“[I] heard this story firsthand weeks ago and [it] seems like [people] are misinterpreting (understandably from the phrasing). To clarify, the missed stick was COMPLETELY an accident and just seemed ‘karma-tic’. She is kind and professional and would never harm anyone intentionally,” Liu tweeted.
Liu’s tweet has also since been deleted.
The Wake Forest School of Medicine released a statement to the media on Wednesday, March 30.
“The actions described in this student’s social media post do not in any way reflect the quality of care and compassion that Wake Forest University School of Medicine strives to provide to our patients each and every day,” the statement read.
“We stand behind our values that include trust, excellence and a space where all belong, and we actively reinforce those values with learners and providers. While federal law does not permit us to share specific information, we are taking the proper measures to address this matter with the student, school leadership is involved.”
A review of the incident described in Del Rosario’s tweet revealed that all procedures were followed while caring for this patient. The School of Medicine’s protocols require documentation of all student actions while treating a patient. If a student has an initial unsuccessful blood draw, the student should not make additional attempts, but have a separate certified medical professional perform the second attempt.
The documentation of this incident verified that after Del Rosario was unsuccessful in obtaining the blood draw, she appropriately deferred a second attempt to a certified professional.
Del Rosario has also apologized for her tweet.
“I am writing this as an apology for a very irresponsible tweet that I sent on Twitter that I highly regret. For the event mentioned in the tweet, I was performing a blood draw on a patient, and during our conversation they had shown dismay at my pronoun pin. I calmly shared my thoughts about pronouns and did not escalate the situation further. When I was doing the blood draw, I missed the first time due to my inexperience as a student, and per our policy, my supervisor performed the successful blood draw the second time.”
Del Rosario continued: “During this encounter, I never intended to harm the patient. I understand how my misguided tweet read that I did intend to harm them as retribution. In an emotional moment, I sent the tweet without thinking about the consequences. I am truly sorry for poorly representing our school and our health system. I will reflect on responsible social media use as a professional and my duty to care for all patients, regardless of any differences in beliefs.”
Nonetheless, Del Rosario has been placed on a leave of absence “as a result of [her] inappropriate and misleading post,” per Paula Faria, the associate vice president at Wake Forest Baptist Health.
While Del Rosario’s tweet was unprofessional, the criticism that has been directed toward her is disproportionate. As the School of Medicine’s review revealed, she followed protocol and certainly did not attack her patient. Missing a patient’s vein is a common occurrence when drawing blood, and is unlikely to cause harm.
A prior review of the incident revealed that Del Rosario followed procedure. Alleging that she attacked her patient simply because she disagreed with a remark they made and chose to tweet about it is an unwarranted logical fallacy. Accusing Del Rosario of medical malpractice without evidence minimizes real incidents of malpractice, a serious issue that disproportionately affects marginalized groups.
Data from the Center for American Progress shows that LGBTQ+ people frequently avoid healthcare because they experience discrimination in these settings. Eight percent of lesbian, bisexual and queer respondents said that a doctor or other healthcare provider refused to see them because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation, while 29% of trans respondents reported that a provider refused to see them because of their actual or perceived gender identity. Respondents also reported the use of harsh or abusive language from these providers, being misgendered and experiencing unwanted physical contact.
Respecting and validating someone’s pronouns and gender identity should not be a matter of political belief or ideology, but one of simple human decency. Everyone has pronouns, regardless of whether or not their gender identity aligns with their biological sex. When cisgender people display their pronouns on social media or wear pronoun pins, it helps foster a safe and accepting space for their trans peers. These acts of solidarity with the LGBTQ+ community should not be mocked — when people shrug off this mockery as a lighthearted joke, they are enforcing cis-normativity and transphobia, encouraging discrimination not just in healthcare, but in other spaces as well.
It is appalling that the vast majority of the media coverage surrounding Del Rosario’s tweet is critiquing her lack of professionalism rather than her patient’s display of bigotry. She has been placed on leave over a poorly-worded tweet, but there has been no known follow-up with the patient concerning the problematic nature of their comments, or even any documentation of their inappropriate behavior.
If the School of Medicine is truly “a space where all belong,” as they expressed in their statement condemning Del Rosario’s tweet, they should not ignore expressions of bigotry, but combat them by seeking to educate their patients and practitioners on the importance of pronouns and respecting others’ identities.
Tom johnson • Mar 20, 2024 at 6:43 am
It is very disturbing that you say the crux of the matter is the patient’s bigotry. The crux of the matter is she is making a joke of a patient needing to get a second jab implying he deserves this. Notice I’m not saying she attacked the patient and I believe that someone else performed the second jab. Again the crux of the matter is she found this funny.
What also is very concerning is you putting the patient’s beliefs, as wrong as they may be, at the forefront of your piece and concluding your article with the importance of teaching the understanding of respecting someone’s pronouns.
A physician’s duty in dealing with the most racist, bigoted patient should be to provide the same level of care that they would provide to all their patients.
That you would frame the heart of the matter to be around the respectful treatment of LGBTQ people and not the lack of professionalism displayed by the med student shows there may be something systemic at play here that has completely skewed your perceptions of what a caregiver should always strive to provide and not even in the slightest jest about subpar outcomes, accidental or otherwise.
I would implore you to reflect on this and consider writing a follow-up piece addressing this.
Joseph Ducreux • Feb 28, 2024 at 11:38 pm
So if my politics are wrong, a DEI surgeon might decide to let me die on the table with a “too bad, one less bigot”?
Jessie • Nov 20, 2023 at 10:28 pm
Pointing out the cult-like silliness of pronouners is hardly bigotry and definitely doesn’t give a medical student the right to try to injure a patient.
The gaslighting in this article is absolutely creepy. This Sophie Guymon comes across like somebody drunk on a mess of bad ideas instead of an actual living, breathing person. I’m glad there’s little chance she’ll ever actually work in the medical field. Especially after some of the articles she’s posted.
I don’t think agenda-driven gender cultists like Kychelle Del Rosario and Sophie Guymon can ever be trusted to work with the public in ANY field. Clearly these two put their strange beliefs over the oaths one takes to work in the medical field.
I wouldn’t trust either of these “she/hers” to run a fry station at a burger stand, let alone draw blood from a human being.
learn to read • Apr 14, 2022 at 4:25 pm
The majority of these comments are completely misguided and uninformed because it’s evident that their authors did not read the article. The patient was not attacked, Del Rosario did not miss his vein on purpose. An investigation was conducted into the incident which found that standard procedure was followed. There were literally witnesses (Del Rosario’s supervisor was present when she was performing the blood draw). The way ya’ll will go off without actually even reading the piece…. tragic
Joseph Ducreux • Feb 28, 2024 at 11:39 pm
So she/her says.
Psychologist • Apr 13, 2022 at 8:54 pm
I think it’s telling that there is no single comment representing agreement with this opinion piece. I see that the author is a psychology major. She appears to be intelligent, albeit misguided. As a licensed psychologist, I hope she reflects on these comments, matures, and grows as an adult. The inherent narcissism in the idea a person in such a position of power as a health care provider can decide who is worthy of kindness and compassion and dole out what they perceive as justice when values don’t align is both frightening and utterly reprehensible.
Mitch • Apr 12, 2022 at 8:37 pm
LOL
Doc • Apr 10, 2022 at 4:44 pm
Sophie, good try at apologetics for an unspeakable act. Patients are always in a relatively powerless position compared with the health care provider who has the power in the relationship. It it reprehensibel that someone so empowered, particularly in a trust position, would take advantage of that power to administer “justice” in such a situation.
The response, if anything, has been muted. The unspoken problem is the root cause of the medical student’s “moral narcissism”. To dare to look at that facet of the problem will force you to acknowledge the corrosiveness of the system that taught her that narcissism. The finger points back to her education both before and at WFU.
ER doc in NC • Apr 10, 2022 at 5:03 am
You’re out of line here. I take care of homeless, rude, racist, bigoted people all the time. And I keep my cool because that’s what it is to be a professional.
It’s also interesting to ponder that you think she [med student] should be given a free pass because the patient was the bigot (he was) but the same woke-think protects the patients who abuse me verbally (and attempt worse) under the auspices of “oh, they’re sick and/or mentally unstable, it’s not their fault!)
Stop the excuses. Stop the double standard
Chuck • Apr 9, 2022 at 6:44 pm
It’s important to remember that people like these two students and the writer of this propaganda piece are the ones who want to control your healthcare. If you think these actions are bold now just wait until they completely control the system.
Christina • Apr 8, 2022 at 7:42 pm
She is a disgrace to the profession of medicine. She certainly alluded to purposefully missing the draw so he would be stuck twice. Her apology is very staged and hollow. She should be dismissed. We physicians will always encounter people who are not kind and we need to treat them equally. The person making excuses for her obviously has an agenda and is displaying poor judgement as well. Truly disgusting.
Dennis Fabian • Apr 8, 2022 at 3:10 pm
This opinion piece is obviously not written by a physician. I , as a physician have taught many mad students and residents throughout my career.
This students actions are completely inexcusable.
Regardless of the patient’s ideology, gender , race etc it is our obligation to first and foremost do no harm.
She is a 4th year med student and should know better. If she was one of my residents I would have suspended her on the spot and recommended that she either be terminated or relegated to research for the remainder of her career.
It’s likely that she will strike again against someone she doesn’t agree with.
Dennis F Fabian D. O. NYC
Jose • Apr 10, 2022 at 6:31 pm
Spot on I did my Fellowship at WFU and her actions should be dealt with. She should have a good experience from this and have her teach other young people that social media is no longer a shadow land where you can hide and say stuff without consequences it goes both ways and she knows now
Mark • Apr 8, 2022 at 12:17 pm
Lol you people are nuts. Yeah, sure. The patient was a “bigot,” or maybe just a regular person who doesn’t even know people are leading with pronoun introductions. How about that? Also, does he have the responsibility of the doctor servicing him? Did he take an oath the way she did? So, stop strawmanning and engaging in whataboutisms. It’s a scary world where a doctor can harm a patient and it’s okay simply because you disagree with their politics. Be quiet. Hush
R Bracken MD • Apr 8, 2022 at 11:18 am
We as physicians are held to a higher standard of conduct and behavior than our patients. Period.
Tony • Apr 8, 2022 at 10:18 am
The bigotry of your patients is something you cannot pick and choose. The only thing you can do is display exemplary bedside manner. It is the physicians duty to cause no further harm to a patient then may be necessary in the process of medical care. What she did was absolutely abhorrent. She should face more criticism than the patient because of the standard she is beholden to.
Tony • Apr 8, 2022 at 10:11 am
The big tree of your patience is something you cannot pick and choose. The only thing you can do is display exemplary bedside manner. It is the positions duty to cause no further harm to a patient then maybe necessary in the process of medical care. What she did was absolutely abhorrent. She should face more criticism than the patient because of the standard she is beholden to.
Tracy • Apr 8, 2022 at 6:35 am
I feel for her because she’s a young new clinician, but, intentional or not, no injury to a patient can be celebrated, laughed about, or considered karma, no matter how “common” or minor someone else perceives them to be. There was no apology or remorse for the celebration, just for sharing the celebration via tweet. And no, the patient’s comments wouldn’t be documented, because they should be irrelevant to the care provided. Also, do you really believe physicians should be permitted/encouraged to chase patients down and tell them how their beliefs are wrong? Really? Do you want your physician doing that to you? Medicine is a different mindset. All personal beliefs go out the window and you do your best, every time, and never celebrate if you fall short.
Red • Apr 7, 2022 at 10:02 pm
“Alleged” She literally admitted to stabbing him wrongfully on purpose, no amount of semantics or puff pieces by the shilling media can change that. I am scared to think what someone like her would do if she found out that millions of people have different political opinions than her and *gasp* disagree with her in many things. Grow up.
Yolo • Apr 7, 2022 at 1:58 pm
Newsflash, in no universe as a physician do you get to cause physical harm to a patient for differing beliefs. You have no place in medicine if you believe you have a right to harm anyone. Sooooo tolerant, intolerant left. Not surprised you lunatics would try to justify this. You are attempting to eliminate all free thought in this nation through violence, canceling, shaming, and now harming vulnerable patients?