Faculty Pass Anti-Racism Resolutions


Olivia Field

Wake Forward, a group of self-described progressive faculty, are currently awaiting the administration’s response to a set of four resolutions that were written by faculty and passed at the March 18 faculty meeting.

The resolutions condemn the administration’s response to instances of “white supremacist language and imagery” in the Howler, support the Wake Forest University Anti-Racism Coalition’s demands and further call upon the university to present tangible progress addressing these issues at the next faculty meeting on April 8.

“Racism on campus is an issue many Wake Forward members have been discussing through this group since its founding — and, of course, many Wake Forward members have been discussing and working on campus racism well before the group was created,” said Michaelle Browers, a member of Wake Forward and professor in the department of politics and international affairs.

Of the requests made in the resolutions, the university has only addressed the need for a space specifically for the Black Student Alliance. The group hopes to see additional progress, but are unsure if it will happen officially.

“Wake Forward has been given time on the [April] agenda to continue this conversation. We do not know if the administration will respond to the resolutions in an official capacity,” said Kristina Gupta, a member of Wake Forward and assistant professor in the department of women’s, gender, and sexuality studies (WGS). “To my knowledge, they have not officially committed to any of the other things requested in the faculty resolutions. Faculty will continue to push to see these resolutions implemented.”

According to an email sent to the members of Wake Forward, the vote occured through a secret ballot with the tally coming out to 130 in favor, 16 against and five abstentions. The resolutions are signed by a group of 65 faculty members ranging from the English and WGS departments to the biology and math departments. 

According to Browers, the resolutions were the product of both multiple in-person discussions, including ones with the student-led Anti-Racism Coalition, and conversations through email and a Google Doc to which the members had access.

“The faculty assembled decided that the first matter was to support the efforts of the [Anti-Racism Coalition],” she said. “However, we also wanted to think about not only how we could serve to lift up their voices by endorsing their demands, but what else the faculty might want to see as part of an effort aimed at addressing anti-black racism and white-supremacy at Wake Forest with the urgency, boldness and broad-based institutional focus these matters warrant.”

The first resolution discusses the fact that “former students,” who are now “prominent leaders of the Wake Forest University community,” are pictured in photos that are part of a larger theme of “white supremacist language and imagery” in the Howler. Although the text does not directly name them, this resolution is alluding to the images of Dean of Admissions Martha Allman and Associate Dean of Admissions Kevin Pittard standing in front of confederate flags in the 1982, and 1983 and 1984 issues of the Howler, respectively. The resolution proceeds to “condemn the Wake Forest University administration’s response to these revelations thus far as inadequate.”

“We believe that a) the responses offered were delayed to the point of negligence; b) the ongoing silence of college and university leaders is unacceptable; c) the responses are wholly insufficient as apologies, redress for harms done, or commitments to policies and programs that would transform the university; and d) these events are consistent with previous failures by university leaders to address anti-black racism and white-supremacy at Wake Forest with the urgency and transparency that they warrant,” the resolution stated.

Directly mentioning the Anti-Racism Coalition, the second resolution endorses their list of nine demands — which include a zero tolerance policy to white supremacy, transparency in bias reporting and more.

The third resolution calls for the university to “engage in a substantive and independent process of Truth and Reconciliation.” By referencing efforts made by Brown University and Georgetown University, it requests that the administration provides a plan to address its “[historical] and present support of white supremacy.”

“We need to shine a bright light on Wake’s history with slavery and racial segregation, and on its struggles with anti-black racism in the contemporary period. We request that the Wake Forest University Administration provide a plan for a Truth and Reconciliation process at the April 2019 College Faculty Meeting,” the resolution stated.

Also calling for more information at the next meeting, the final resolution asks that the Office of the Provost reports back about progress made with the “Community in Progress” project. This project accepted recommendations from communities across campus, and commissioned a Campus Climate Implementation Team to respond to and implement the recommendations.

Provost Rogan Kersh did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Overall, Gupta expressed the need for larger institutional changes that aim to address the problem of white supremacy and racism on campus.

“I think it is vital for students to understand that this is a bigger issue than just the yearbook photos,” Gupta said. “White supremacy is embedded in Wake Forest as an institution, in everything from building names, to the lack of faculty, students and upper-level administrators of color, to the legacy system, to the curriculum, to the athletics system, to the employment of low wage contract laborers who are mostly people of color. Addressing these broader issues will require an institutional commitment to systemic and systematic change, which is what the faculty resolutions call for.”

Editor’s note: Faculty advisor to Old Gold & Black Phoebe Zerwick is a member of Wake Forward.